The Virginian Pilot: Editorial: President’s behavior demands answers

VIRGINIAN PILOT

HOUSE SPEAKER Nancy Pelosi built a framework for impeaching President Donald Trump on Tuesday afternoon, pointing to the words of Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine in building her case for pursuing a formal inquiry into the chief executive’s conduct in office.

Of Franklin, she recounted the tale about the conclusion of the Constitutional Convention, when someone asked the statesman, diplomat and inventor what the delegates had crafted and he replied, “A republic … if you can keep it.”

And of Paine, she quoted his famous pamphlet “Common Sense,” which many historians agree lit the fuse for revolution and independence, in which he wrote of the reluctance to force a separation from Britain, but that “The time hath found us.”

It was compelling oratory and an unvarnished assessment of what she and many Americans believe to be the stakes of the process now unfolding in Washington.

In July, Trump spoke by phone with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was elected earlier this year, to discuss a variety of topics that included the conflict between that country and Russia which began in 2014. Zelensky wanted the United States to provide military assistance to aid in Ukraine’s defense.

“I would like you to do us a favor,” Trump said, according to a summary of the phone call released by the White House on Wednesday. He then asked Zelensky to investigate the activity of Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President Joe Biden, and to coordinate those efforts with Attorney General Bob Barr and the president’s personal lawyer, former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani.

The conversation was the subject of a whistleblower’s complaint, filed by someone in the intelligence community, which was sent to the director of National Intelligence and the inspector general for review. The complaint was then referred to the U.S. Department of Justice, which concluded the president’s actions did not warrant a criminal investigation.

However, the charge is a serious one since it essentially alleges the president tied his request to $391 million in foreign aid earmarked for Ukraine. The Washington Post reported this week that Trump, prior to the July phone call, asked acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney to delay release of that money and the president has offered conflicting explanations to justify that decision.

Democratic leaders in the House correctly believe the issue demands a full accounting.

There is reason to conclude that the president, in making this request, was looking for foreign help to smear a political rival, as Biden is a leading contender for his party’s nomination for president. Obtaining that help may well constitute a campaign finance law violation.

Had the president linked millions in aid to such an inappropriate request, one intended to provide him a political advantage in next year’s election, many would conclude that to be an abuse of power. Unquestionably, it would represent conduct unbecoming of the office.

Given these revelations, Pelosi announced on Tuesday that the House would begin a formal impeachment inquiry of the president. It’s expected that committee leaders will seek testimony from the whistleblower and a full transcript of the president’s conversation rather than rely on the White House’s summary released on Wednesday.

By framing this process as a matter of necessity and dressing it in the precedent of history, Pelosi hopes to win over Republicans in Congress who remain unwavering Trump supporters and defend his every action. She has been reluctant to take this step, and her willingness to proceed now speaks to the seriousness of the allegations.

That is also reflected by moderate members in swing districts now backing an investigation, including first-term Reps. Elaine Luria in Virginia’s 2nd District and Abigail Spanberger in the 7th, both of whom won election touting their national security backgrounds.

Trump makes it difficult to separate this one incident from the dozens of other actions that defy convention, diminish the office or otherwise appear to run afoul of federal law. But this episode does raise considerable and serious questions about the president. Americans are entitled to answers.

 

Recent Posts


Jun 17, 2024
Local Issues

NEW MILESTONE: Spanberger’s Office Returns More Than $39 Million in Federal Benefits to Virginians

Since the Start of 2019, the Congresswoman’s Office Has Returned More Than $39 Million in Backlogged IRS Refunds, Social Security Checks, VA Benefits, & More WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Representative Abigail Spanberger announced today that her office has now returned more than $39 million in federal casework funds to residents of Virginia’s Seventh District. Casework dollars […]



Jun 14, 2024
Press

Spanberger Statement on Supreme Court Ruling to Strike Down Federal Bump Stock Ban

Congresswoman: “As a Former Federal Law Enforcement Officer, I Know that Weapons Designed to Inflict Maximum Casualties Do Not Belong on Our Streets, in Our Schools, or in Our Communities” WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Representative Abigail Spanberger today released the following statement following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Garland v. Cargill, which overturns a […]



Jun 14, 2024
Gun Safety

During National Gun Violence Awareness Month, Spanberger Urges Speaker Johnson to Bring Bipartisan Bills to U.S. House Floor to Prevent Gun Violence

Congresswoman: “I Used To Carry A Gun Every Single Day — I Know What It Is To Be A Responsible Gun Owner” WASHINGTON, D.C. — On the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Representative Abigail Spanberger — a Member of the U.S. House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force — urged Speaker Johnson to […]