Richmond Times-Dispatch: Virginia congressional delegation seeks probe of FBI decision


irginia’s congressional delegation has called for an investigation of the federal government’s decision to build a new FBI headquarters in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C., instead of a site in Northern Virginia.

The General Services Administration, which manages federally owned property, selected a proposed site next to a Washington Metro station in Greenbelt, Maryland, last week, overriding a unanimous recommendation by a three-member panel to build the $4.1 billion project on federally owned property in Springfield.

Both Virginia senators — Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, Democrats and former governors — joined with nine of Virginia’s 11 congressional representatives in asking Robert Erickson, acting inspector general of the GSA, to investigate the site selection process and allegations of a conflict of interest in the final decision. Warner and Kaine called for an investigation last week and indicated a formal request would be coming from Virginia.

“There is overwhelming evidence suggesting that the General Services Administration (GSA) administered a site selection process fouled by political considerations and alleged impropriety — one that was repeatedly curated to arrive at a predetermined outcome,” the delegation said in the letter.

Virginia leaders cited the concerns raised by FBI Director Christopher Wray, who objected to the process used to select the Greenbelt site.

Wray, in a candid message to FBI employees the morning after the decision, noted that a panel of two veteran GSA employees and one FBI employee had unanimously recommended the Springfield site in Fairfax County. However, he said a GSA administrator, described as “a political appointee,” overrode the panel recommendation to select the Greenbelt site, owned by the Metro system, the administrator’s previous employer.

“Almost immediately after directing the final site selection to Greenbelt, the political appointee promptly left the federal government, implicating Congress’s ability to engage with this individual in an oversight capacity,” the Virginia delegation said in its letter. “In defending the indefensible, GSA has decided to proceed with the selection of Greenbelt over the objections of its client agency, the FBI.”

“These facts, when taken together, paint an ugly picture of a fatally flawed procurement that demands further investigation,” the letter states.

GSA Director Robin Carnahan strongly defended the site selection process in a lengthy congressional oversight hearing Tuesday, at which Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-11th, explicitly asked for an investigation. Maryland officials also have pushed back hard against the accusation by Wray and Virginia leaders.

“I am disappointed that Director Wray and my colleagues in the Virginia Delegation would call into question the integrity of this process simply because they preferred a different outcome,” former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said in a statement last week.

In addition to Warner, Kaine and Connolly, the Virginia representatives signing the letter are: Reps. Bobby Scott, D-3rd, Rob Wittman, R-1st, Don Beyer, D-8th, Abigail Spanberger, D-7th, Jennifer Wexton, D-10th, Jennifer McClellan, D-4th, Jen Kiggans, R-2nd, and Morgan Griffith, R-9th.

Reps. Bob Good, R-5th, and Ben Cline, R-6th, are the only members of the delegation who did not sign the letter.

Good, Cline and Griffith voted last week against appropriating money for the FBI headquarters, which will employ about 7,500 people.

Good, in a social media post last week, stated his objections to the project, which stem in part from opposition among conservative Republicans to the FBI investigations of former President Donald Trump.

“We ought not build a new FBI building, borrowing & spending taxpayer money for a multibillion dollar facility larger than the Pentagon,” he said in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. “Instead, we ought to be SCRUTINIZING the money spent by a compromised FBI that targets conservatives, parents, & faith groups.”

Recent Posts

Jun 21, 2024
Womens' Issues

Ahead of Two-Year Anniversary of Dobbs Decision, Spanberger Helps Lead Bicameral Effort to Repeal Antiquated Law Restricting Abortion

The “Stop Comstock Act” Would Block Future Administrations from Using 150-Year-Old Statute to Ban the Mailing of Mifepristone & Other Drugs Used in Medication Abortions WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Representative Abigail Spanberger today helped introduce bicameral legislation in response to clear intent by extreme politicians and judges to misuse an archaic law from the 1800s […]

Jun 21, 2024
Womens' Issues

Spanberger Statement Marking Two Years Since Supreme Court Overturned Roe v. Wade 

Congresswoman: “On the Second Anniversary of this Dark Day in Our Nation’s History, We Must Recommit Ourselves to Codifying Roe v. Wade and Resisting All Attempts to Turn Back the Clock on Women’s Rights” WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Representative Abigail Spanberger today released the following statement ahead of Monday, June 24, 2024 — two years […]

Jun 20, 2024

Spanberger, Carey Lead Bipartisan Effort to Waive Passport Fees for Family Visiting Injured Servicemembers Abroad

The “No Passport Fees for Heroes’ Families Act” Would Apply to Family Members Visiting Injured Servicemembers Who Are Not Yet Medically Cleared to Travel Back to the United States WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Representative Abigail Spanberger (D-VA-07) and Mike Carey (R-OH-15) introduced bipartisan legislation to waive passport fees for family members obtaining a passport for […]